Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Mind And Its Relationship With The Mind - 1366 Words

Mind and Its Relation to the Brain How to define minds has always been a challenge for the â€Å"lovers of wisdom† since the advent of modern philosophy. The mind is arduous to define because it is incorporeal and the only person knowing its existence is its owner. That is; the mind differs from those familiar physical stuffs which can easily be defined in terms of their characteristics. Facing the thorny problem, the debate between dualists and physicalists about the nature of mind and its relationship with the body is becoming intense. In this paper I will maintain that the epiphnomenalism is not â€Å"repugnant†, but rather it is squat and resilient would be the best theory to illustrate the relationship between mind and body. The paper†¦show more content†¦In other words, the physical activity can influence the mental but the mental stuff can never affect the physical stuff in turn. Such definition of mind neatly explains that the mind is a kind of an excr escence of the physical activity in the mind. Likewise, Frank Jackson takes Fred’s story as an familiar example to explain that experience is hard to obtain even one have all the physical information, and indicate the such qualia problem is missed by physicalist. In this case, Epiphenomenalism can be used in dualism to argue that there is a connection between physical action and the mental activity.That is; Epiphenomenalism divides a complete action into three parts. One’s actions are determined by the physical action of the central body in the mind. During this process, the physical activities also cause the epiphenomena we call ideas. Besides, Epiphenomenalism is also a controversial topic in the dualism, since the mind in Epiphenomenalism is not only is a non-spatial stuff, but also is an epiphenomenon of physical action in the brain. That is why the most dualists claims that it is unacceptable to think of the mind as â€Å"a causally impotent by-products of brain activities.† But it does not mean that the mind is superfluous belongings. Frank Jackson says that the mental stuff as the same as the â€Å"heavy coat† which is the flaw but also is

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.